Carlotti APCP, Bohn D, Mallie JP, Halperin ML
Comparison of an electrolyte-free water and a tonicity
balance: Which provides the best way to determine why the plasma
sodium concentration (PNa) changes and its treatment?
Am Soc Nephrol Ann Mtg -- Toronto
J Am Soc Nephrol
(Sep) 11:103A 2000

Background: Electrolyte-free water (EFW) terms are commonly
used to decide why the PNa changed and to plan goals for its
therapy.
Objective: To evaluate whether an EFW balance reveals the
basis for a change in PNa and what treatment measures are needed to
restore the ECF and ICF volumes.
Methods: A 40 kg boy had a
pheochromocytoma removed by neurosurgery. Over the first 9 h, his urine
volume was 4 L with a [Na+K] of 50 mM. His PNa rose to 157 mM. The only IV
was 3 L of isotonic saline (iso NaCl).
EFW balance: He received only
iso NaCl so there was no EFW input. Dividing his urine into iso NaCl and
EFW, he excreted 2.7 L of EFW. Based on this, 2.7 L of D5W should be
infused to replace his negative balance of EFW.
Tonicity balance: In
this calculation Na+K and water are analyzed separately. Input was 450
mmol and output 200 mmol Na+K, a positive balance of 250 mmol Na+K. Water
balance was –1 L. Based on this, therapy to lower his PNa would clearly be
to create a negative balance of 250 mmol Na+K and a positive balance of 1
L of water.
Hypothetical examples: If the IV was 0 or 4 L of iso NaCl,
EFW balance would be identical. Tonicity balance is very different and
dictates therapy. With no IV, the 4L water + 200 mmol Na+K deficits must
be replaced. With the 4 L iso NaCl input, excrete the excess 400 mmol
Na+K.
Conclusions: An EFW balance reveals only that the PNa will
change. It does not reveal why PNa changed or how to treat it. A tonicity
balance reveals why the plasma [Na] changed and what its treatment goals
should be.
Copyright 2000, American Society
of Nephrology