|
Please
download and print the PDF file below:
|
|
|
|
Alexandra McCarthy, PhD, RN
|
Alexandra McCarthy, PhD, RN, is Senior
Lecturer, School of Nursing and Midwifery,
Queensland University of Technology and Princess
Alexandra Hospital, Kelvin Grove, Queensland,
Australia.
|
|
Ramon Shaban, PhDc, RN
|
Ramon Shaban, PhDc, RN, is Senior Research
Fellow, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith
Institute for Health and Medical Research, Griffith
University and Princess Alexandra Hospital,
Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia.
|
|
Jennifer Boys, MHSc, RN
|
Jennifer Boys, MHSc, RN, is Renal Nurse
Educator, Centre for Clinical Nursing, Royal
Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston,
Queensland, Australia.
|
|
Sarah Winch, PhD, RN
|
Sarah Winch, PhD, RN, is Senior Lecturer,
School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St
Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
|
Monitoring and enhancing patient compliance with peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a recurring
and problematic theme in the renal literature. A growing body of literature also
argues that a failure to understand the patient’s perspective of compliance may be contributing
to these problems. The aim of this study was to understand the concept of compliance
with PD from the patient’s perspective. Using the case study approach recommended
by Stake (1995), five patients on PD consented to in-depth interviews that
explored the meaning of compliance in the context of PD treatment and lifestyle regimens
recommended by health professionals. Participants also discussed factors that influenced
their choices to follow, disregard, or refine these regimens. Results indicate that health
professionals acting in alignment with individual patient needs and wishes, and demonstrating
an awareness of the constraints under which patients operate and the strengths
they bring to their treatment, may be the most significant issues to consider with respect
to definitions of PD compliance and the development of related compliance interventions.
Aspects of compliance that promoted relative normality were also important to the
participants in this study and tended to result in greater concordance with health professionals’
advice.
|
|
CE
RELATED INFORMATION |
|
This
offering for 1.0 contact
hours is being provided by
the
American
Nephrology Nurses Association
(ANNA), ANNA is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education (CNE) by the American
Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation.
ANNA is a provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, provider number
CEP 00910.
This CNE article meets the Nephrology Nursing Certification Commission’s (NNCC’s) continuing
nursing education requirements for certification and recertification.
|
|
Goal:
To provide an overview of compliance among patients with peritoneal dialysis as
related to this study’s findings.
Objectives:
1. Explain the concept of a case study as presented in this study’s design.
2. Describe ways in which participants in this study complied with their peri toneal
dialysis treatment regimen.
3. Define compliance to peritoneal dialysis as viewed by this study’s participants.
4. Identify an instance where a participant was not compliant to his or her peritoneal
dialysis treatment regimen and why.
|
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT |
Alexandra McCarthy has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ramon Shaban has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Jennifer Boys has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Sarah Winch has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
|
ANNA and HDCN CE POLICY STATEMENTS |
The CE policy and disclosure statements of the American Nephrology
Nurses' Association are given in detail on the Symposium
Home Page. The CE policy statements of HDCN are listed on
this page. |