HDCN-MGR: Diabetes with hypoalbuminemia (continued)

Discussion of Questions

1. true
2. true
3. (c) decreased hepatic production, and (d) increased vascular permeability

Discussants:
Dr. R. Zimlichman. Head of the Department of Internal Medicine F, and Chief of the Hypertension Unit, Edith Wolfson Hospital , Holon, Israel
Dr. H. Eliahou. Research Associate of the Hypertension Clinic, Edith Wolfson Hospital, Tel-Aviv University School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Dr. R. Zimlichman:
This patient presented with an unusual and rather rare clinical picture. In this subgroup of patients we see a very mild form of diabetes mellitus, minimal hyperglycemia, or euglycemia, yet they have a clearly abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT). The clinical expression of end organ damage is disproportionate to the severity of the diabetes . Despite almost normal glucose levels, these patients develop moderate to severe chronic renal failure, retinopathy and evidence of vascular damage presenting with proteinuria, vision loss, and/or peripheral vascular disease. They present signs of a chronic disease, like weight loss which is sometimes camouflaged by the fluid retention, general weakness, loss of appetite, loss of libido, sometimes secondary depression, and often anemia of the microcytic normochromic type.

This group of patients, like the one presented, usually suffer from hypoalbuminemia disproportionate to the urine protein loss. My assumption is that as a part of the chronic disease manifestations, decreased hepatic albumin production is present despite the absence of overt hepatic dysfunction. The prognosis of this group of patients is usually bad. Many of them suffer from iatrogenic complications which are mainly induced by contrast media injected during the process of angiography for the evaluation of PVD or in the intra-venous pyelographies. The danger of these procedures is prominent especially when preventive measures such as adequate hydration, are not practised.

Why do such diabetic patients, who are almost euglycemic, have such a grave prognosis? Today we are able to understand these phenomena much better than a few decades ago. Patients in this group usually have multiple vascular risk factors. In our patient, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia with association of heavy smoking in the past, and positive family history of CVD, were present. All these factors can explain the accelerated atherosclerosis, even when blood glucose levels were only mildly elevated. My assumption is that this patient, like most other patients in this group, is hyperinsulinemic. Hyperinsulinemia, with the resulting accelerated atherosclerosis, is the price that this patient has to pay for maintaining euglycemia. I believe that this patient represents a specific subgroup of diabetic patients with relative euglycemia but with a grave prognosis. Usually these patients are identified easily on clinical grounds. Further studies are needed to identify these specific patients and to try to determine the pathogenesis of their accelerated atherosclerosis and their early and rapid target organ damage.


Dr. H. Eliahou:
This is a case of severe NIDDM with very high glycosylation of hemoglobin, despite the fact that he is not obese and despite the fact that his blood sugar is not very high. The HbA1c, which is a good objective measure of glucose control (1,2) reached a value of 13.9% a month or so before his first admission. It was reduced after treatment to 11.2% and on admission to 9% after therapy and blood glucose control. This in itself is an indication that the patient's diabetes mellitus was poorly controlled. He developed the full blown clinical picture of nephrotic syndrome. This was associated with two rather uncommon clinical features:

1) A rather low value of urine protein excretion of about 4 g per day, which does not explain his severe nephrotic syndrome with severe hypoalbuminemia.

2) The hypoalbuminemia reverted to near normal after a very short while with standard therapy, which included dietary supply of adequate number of calories and a sucrose-free diet. He had received plasma only twice, 2 units each time.

The question is where did his albumin go? The 3 possibilities are :

1) Lack of protein synthesis in the liver, due to the severity of the disease. There was neither clinical (no signs of portal hypertension) nor laboratory evidence of hepatic dysfunction. (liver function tests were normal).

2) Gastrointestinal loss of albumin. There were no gastro-intestinal symptoms or signs to support this hypothesis. He has had no steatorrhea. His diet was that of low sugar only. He ate proteins normally. He had no signs of vomiting or non-absorption.

3) Loss of albumin into the interstitial space due to the increased permeability of the vascular walls secondary to the high glycosylation.

The last hypothesis is supported by the fact that he had a high level of glycosylation of hemoglobin, and that with high protein diet the hypoalbuminemia was corrected rather quickly. The glycosylation allows an increased permeability through the capillary walls, resulting in retinopathy and nephropathy. It is presumed that the patient had developed severe glycosylation of vascular wall proteins which resulted in a high permeability, allowing for loss of protein as well as fluids into the interstitial spaces. It can be argued that this process is self limiting and that another factor is responsible for the continued hypoalbuminemia. The rapidity with which this hypoalbuminemia was corrected shows that even if other factors did play a role in its pathogenesis, their role was rather minor and could be counteracted rather rapidly by simple means.

The transcapillary escape rate of albumin (TERalb) is an indicator of dysfunction of the microvascular wall, i.e., a measure of the permeability of the vessels, indicating atherosclerotic damage to these walls (3,4). The TERalb is the fraction of intravascular albumin which passes to the extravascular space per unit time. This is expressed as the decrease in plasma radioactivity after the injection of 123-I-albumin.

The TERalb is elevated in patients with diabetes mellitus especially in those who were poorly controlled (5), even if the blood pressure is normal. Nevertheless, the escape rate is blood pressure dependent, since the acute infusion of clonidine causes a decrease in TERalb parallel to the decrease in systemic blood pressure (6). Nannipieri et al (7) found that TERalb was increased in the type 2 diabetic patient with albuminuria and that this loss was associated with the severity of the HbA1c found in the blood, i.e., the higher the HbA1c, the greater the TERalb.

Bucala and Vlassara (8) in their in-depth review state that there is little doubt that the primary cause of complications in diabetes is the hyperglycemia and that advanced glycosylation end products act to increase vascular permeability. Furthermore, it was possible to reduce the clinical manifestations of nephropathy and neuropathy by 30% to 60% when the intensively treated diabetics were compared with conventionally treated patients (9).

In summary, we have a diabetic patient whose diabetes is of recent onset and of a seemingly mild nature, who developed serious end-organ damage associated with a very high HbA1c within a few months, despite normoglycemia on many blood tests. This clinical entity seems to be a variant of the common or the usually-seen diabetes mellitus, with hyperinsulinemia causing early vasculopathy. The nephrotic syndrome which became severe in a very short time of only a few weeks, seems to have been due to the markedly increased permeability of the vascular wall, since the urinary losses of albumin were rather mild, ie <4 g/day and the HbA1c was high. Whether there were such associated phenomena as hepatic decrease in albumin production , as proposed by one of the discussants (RZ) or a decrease in GI absorption of proteins, cannot be ruled out from the available data. However, it does seem to me that the TERalb into the surrounding interstitial tissues could play an important role in the development of the anasarca and the hypoalbuminemia.

References
1. Koenig RJ, Peterson CM, Jones RL, Saudek C, Lehrman M, Cerami A. Correlation of glucose regulation and hemoglobin A1c in diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 1976;295:417-420.

2. Larsen ML, Horder M, Mogensen EF. Effect of long-term monitoring of glycosylated hemoglobin levels in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 1990;323:1021-1025.

3. Tooke JE. Methodologies used in the study of microcirculation in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev 1993;9:57-70.

4. Porta M, LaSelva M,Molinatti P, Molinatti GM. Endothelial cell function in diabetic microangiopathy. Diabetologia 1987;30:601-609.

5. O'Hare JA, Ferris JB, Twomey B, O'Sullivan DJ. Poor metabolic control, hypertension, and microangiopathy independentlyincrease the transcapillary escape rate of albumin in diabetes. Diabetologia 1983;25:260-263.

6. Parving HH, Kastrup J, Smidt UM. Reduced transcapillary escape of albumin during acute blood pressure lowering in type I (insulin dependent) diabetic patients with nephropathy. Diabetologia 1985;28:797-801.

7. Nannipieri M, Rizzo L, Rapuano A, Pilo A, Penno G, Navalesi R. Increased transcapillary escape rate of albumin in microalbuminuric type II diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1-9.

8. Bucala R , Vlassara H. Advanced glycosylation end products in diabetic renal and vascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1995;26:875-888.

9. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986.





Could you comment about the elevated serum alkaline phosphatase level?
John T. Daugirdas (jtdaugir@uic.edu)
Chicago, IL USA-Saturday, March 30, 1996 at 13:02:47 (CST)


While diabetic nephropathy is by far and away the most common renal biopsy finding in patients with diabetes, other renal diagnoses can be seen in diabetic patients. You did not present the eyeground findings nor the urinalysis in this patient. Unless you saw proliferative retinopathy, I believe that renal biopsy is indicated despite the fact that, as I said earlier, diabetes is the most likely diagnosis.
Steven B. Tucker, MD, FACP (70554.645@compuserve.com)
Anchorage, Alaska USA-Saturday, March 30, 1996 at 13:05:12 (CST)

I agree that the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy is not clear in this patient. I also would like clear evidence of diabetic retinopathy. Also, it must be kept in mind that the degree of proteinuria and the extent of hypoalbuminemia may not alway s correlate because of tubular catabolism of filtered albumin. Thus, it is possible to filter a great deal more albumin than actually appears in the urine.
David J. Leehey, M.D. (djleehey@aol.com)
Hines, IL U.S.A.-Monday, April 01, 1996 at 16:0 2:18 (CST)



I read your presentation three times. Perhaps I should read it a fourth time. Tell me if I missed something. Did you establish that your patient was not diabetic a year earlier? Did you establish that he did NOT have NIDDM for the last 10 to 20 years? Did you biopsy his kidney? Do you know that he did not have another cause of nephrotic syndrome??? I have never been able to find a direct relationship between the severity of proteinuria and the severity of the hypoalbuminemia. Have you? Why does this man NOT have membranous glomerulopathy? or membrano- proliferative disease? Does it make sense to propose that the hyperglycemia is responsible for the complications of diabetes and then present a complicated case that is characterized by "mild hyperglycemia" of short duration??
Vincent R. Pateras M.D. (v-pateras@nwu.edu)
Evanston , IL USA-Wednesday, May 29, 1996 at 22:26:36 (CDT)

Reply to Dr Pateras: Thanks for your comment. You have put your finger on the very point I wanted to make. I am trying to explain the discrepancy between the intensity of the proteinuria and the intensity of the hypoalbuminemia ( which you yourself have observed). I believe that this lack of correlation occurs in the diabetic and not in the nephritic, because of the glycosylation of the proteins of the vascular walls and the insuing leakage of the albumin into the extra-vascular spaces. In answer to the specific questions: 1/ The patient claims that he was not diabetic 3-4 years ago. 2/ Biopsy of the kidney was not done. 3/ The diagnosis of membranous nephropathy is at least, clinically, not likely. The patient was diabetic with hyperglycemia, with elevated HbA1c, with retinopathy and even neuropathy. 4/ It is indeed likely that the hyperglycemia is responsible for the complications,
Haskel Eliahou MD
Ramat Chen, Ramat-Gan Israel, 52241-Thursday, May 30, 1996 at 10:00:45 (CDT)


I am a fourth-year medical student, and I apologize for commenting as I am only a medical student.I also apologize if my questions seem simplistic in nature. Regarding the patient's medical history, was the patient on any medication that may have contributed to his nephrotic-range proteinuria. Was the patient on an ACE inhibitor? Were any serological performed to exclude other systemic causes (ex: hepatitis, RPR, etc). I was also wondering about the patient's race. I had read that membranous glomerulonephritis was the leading cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in adults, but this was more prominent among Caucasians, and that FSGS was more prominent among African-Americans. I am fascinated by this case because i had the opportunity to participate on a case of an individual who presented the same way, but was found to have amore significant proteinuria. I was also wondering about the patient's Total Protein level. The serum albumin was 2.6, the corrected Calcium around 9.7-9.8. Thank you for your time, and thanks for having and discussing cases such as this one.
richardsnyder (richardsnyder@hotmail.com)
bensalem, pa unites states-Friday, November 21, 1997 at 07:35:01 (PST)