|
 |
Article Review/Hyperlink
|
Steuer RR, Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK, Senekjian HO, Conis JM
Reducing symptoms during hemodialysis by continuously
monitoring the hematocrit
Am J Kidney Dis
(Apr) 27:525-532 1996

Hypotension represents a common problem in maintenance dialysis
patients affecting 20-30% of all treatments. In some patients, there
seems to be a critical blood volume level below which hypotension
occurs [based on 20+ year old data]. Most methods to determine
changes in blood volume during dialysis are inconvenient, not rapid
and difficult to use. This article describes a method which monitors
the hematocrit by a optical technique based on a sensor attached to
the arterial blood line just proximal to the dialyzer. Changes in
hematocrit can be used as a guide to changes in blood volume.
Assuming that red cell mass remains constant, a given hematocrit level
during a dialysis session may also represent a given level of total
blood volume.
In the present study, the focus was on symptoms (lightheadedness,
muscle crampling, and nausea, rather than on blood pressure per se.
The hypothesis, based on preliminary study was, that such symptoms
were associated with a patient-specific level of hypovolemia, as
indicated by a critical hematocrit. In this unit, sodium gradient
dialysis (150 to 140 mEq/L) is routinely used, with a constant UF
rate. In an initial study, 6 patients were studied over 43
treatments, to determine a critical hematocrit level at which symptoms
occurred. It is stated that the "symptom crit" was reproducible, with
an SD of about 1.2 Hct units, although how often this "symptom crit"
was reached in sessions without symptoms was not specified. One
patient was dropped due to lack of symptoms
In phase two of the study, 5 patients were dialyzed either with a
constant UF rate or with a step UF rate (initially 1.25% of the
computed constant rate), which was then reduced (by 25%) when the
previously determined "symptom crit" minus 2 Hct units was reached.
The UF rate was then increased or decreased as needed to keep the Hct
below the "symptom crit".
The postdialysis weight was not increased during dialyses with Hct-
guided UF, and the number of sessons with intradialytic symptoms
decreased from 16/28 (57%) to 7/27 (26%). It is concluded that Hct-
guided UF reduces the incidence of nausea, lightheadedness, and muscle
cramps. Interestingly, the maximum fall in MAP was not reduced using
Hct-guided stepped UF vs. control sessions
Comment:
This may be the simple volume measuring device that dialysis units
need to assess "dry weight". It requires more testing in different
units. This was a most provocative paper and should lead
nephrologists to aggressively review dry weights in their hypertensive
patients.
There are several caveats. Because the initial UF rate was increased,
and a sodium gradient method was used, the symptomatic benefits may
have been due to a non-linear UF rate rather than to Hct-control of UF
rate. Also, the rationale for lumping together diverse symptoms such
as lightheadedness, nausea, and muscle cramps is not clear. The
symptoms were not analyzed separately. Finally, the number of
patients (n=5) was quite small, and, as the control and experimental
treatments were alternated, patient blinding was not done
(Lionel Mailloux, M.D., North Shore University Hospital)
Related Folders: |
 |
|
|
|
|