Rehman F, Mansoor GA, White WB
"Inappropriate" physician habits in prescribing oral nifedipine
capsules in hospitalized patients
Am J Hypertens
(Oct) 9:1035-1039 1996

This study by Rehman et al. begins with the observation that no FDA
approved indication exists for the use of nifedipine for acute
treatment of hypertension. It then documents the widely disparate and
apparently arbitrary use of nifedipine for the acute treatment of
hypertension. Certainly, the last three decades have brought us a
wide variety of antihypertensive agents which have made the treatment
of hypertension relatively simple and convenient. Perhaps too
convenient. Hypertensive emergencies or urgencies are clear defined
and understood by many physicians. Unfortunately most situations in
which the question of acute treatment for hypertension arises do not
fall within these definitions. Nevertheless the need for treatment is
often felt to be compelling, if not by the physician then by the
nurse, the patient or the family. All of these people have their
differing constructs concerning hypertension and its treatment, which
almost certainly contributes directly to the diversity of clinical
situations in which nifedipine is used.
For this study data was collected on all hospitalized patients
receiving oral nifedipine for an 8 week period. Emergency department
patients were excluded. Nifedipine was prescribed by phone in 63% of
cases for "arbitrary and asymptomatic" levels of blood pressure
elevation. In one-third of patients the diastolic pressure was normal
at the time of treatment. Only in exceptional cases was a bedside
evaluation performed before administration of nifedipine. Documention
of follow-up by a clinicinan was noted in 51% of patients within one
hour and an additional 24% at two hours. Nifedipine effectively
lowered the systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 32 and 22 mmHg
respectively. One patient was noted to become hypotensive with a
subsequent anterior myocardial infarction which was attributed to the
administration of nifedipine.
Comment: Rehman et al. evaluated the quality of care given to
patients receiving nifedipine. The level of care that was found
compared unfavorably with that level considered appropriate by the
authors. Would the inclusion of emergency room patients have
decreased this apparent clinical delinquency? In the emergency room
setting, where a significant amount of oral nifedipine is used,
follow-up blood pressure measurements and clinical evaluations by the
nurse and physician are more frequent. (Greg Cowell, M.D.,
University of Illinois at Chicago)