|
 |
Article Review/Hyperlink
|
Howard G, Anderson R, Johnson NJ, Sorlie P, Russell G, Howard
VJ
Evaluation of social status as a contributing factor to the stroke
belt region of the United States
Stroke
(May) 28:936-940 1997

Source:
American Heart Association News release
DALLAS, May 13 -- For decades it's been known that stroke,
the nation's third deadliest disease, takes its highest toll in the
Southeastern
United States. Now researchers say this stroke belt has a “buckle”
-- a zone-within-a-zone that has stroke death rates “substantially
higher”
than the stroke belt itself and twice as high as the rest of the
country.
Reporting in the May issue of the American Heart Association
journal Stroke, the scientists identify the “buckle” as coastal
plain sectors
of North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. In this 153-county
area, the new study shows, stroke deaths are 2.1 times higher than
the
rate of the nation overall among people ages 35 to 54 and 1.7 times
greater
for people between 55 and 74.
George Howard, Dr.P.H., the report’s lead author, estimates that
this “localized bulge” represents “more than 1,000 extra deaths a
year
from stroke.” He says the nation should be “outraged” by this loss
of life. “If any single other factor, such as an environmental
element
or a food additive, was causing this many deaths every year, there
would
be a major outcry.”
In the larger area traditionally recognized as making up the
stroke belt, stroke deaths were 1.3 times higher than in the rest
of the
nation for those ages 35 to 54 and 55 to 74, the study showed. The
five other stroke belt states are Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi
and Alabama.
Surprisingly, Howard and his colleagues found only a slim
statistical
connection between stroke death rates and socioeconomic status
(SES) as
measured by income and education levels. SES, acknowledged to be
lower than the national average in much of the stroke belt, has
been suggested
by other studies as a cause for the region’s increased stroke death
toll.
But the researchers report finding that “SES does not appear
to be a major contributor to the excess [stroke] mortality” in the
Southeastern
United States. They calculate that less than 16 percent of the
excess
stroke risk found in the stroke belt or buckle is explained by the
contribution
of SES.
Previous comparisons of SES and stroke in the Southeast have
been based on studies that involve collecting information on areas
or groups
of people, not individuals, Howard says. “This is the first study
to my knowledge that has data on the SES of individuals and
confirmation
of death of individuals, and correlated those two.”
The investigators at Bowman Gray School of Medicine in
Winston-Salem,
N.C., used information from the National Longitudinal Mortality
Study,
which matches (via Social Security numbers) data from death
certificates
with information on income, occupation and education collected from
regular
Census Bureau unemployment reports. The data from 1979-89 covered
some 400,000 participants who were observed for an average of 8.4
years.
Reasons for the excess stroke deaths in the stroke belt, and
particularly, the buckle, remain a mystery, notes Howard, professor
of
biostatistics and epidemiology at Bowman Gray.
“Actually,” he says, “it could be a wide range of things.”
Risk could be inherent in the geography through components like the
drinking
water or soil-borne elements that end up in food, for example. “Or
it could be regional differences in lifestyle choices, irrespective
of
the individual’s SES. It could be habits like smoking more
cigarettes
or eating more fat and salt. The bottom line is, we still don’t
know,”
he says.
“Despite the fact that this phenomenon has been here for half
a century, no one really understands why it’s there. And there’s
very little funding to search for the answers.”
Although the new findings appear to rule out SES as a potential
cause of the excess stroke deaths, Howard says it’s clear SES is
still
a risk factor for stroke, especially among African-Americans in the
region,
whose risk of stroke is 1.5 times higher than whites’.
The excess stroke deaths, the Bowman Gray team believes, are
related to factors that often accompany low SES that also increase
stroke
risk -- smoking, high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity and
physical inactivity.
“The lower average SES of the Southeastern United States has long
been
considered a possible explanatory cause for the stroke belt, with
SES acting
to raise risk through an association with traditional stroke risk
factors
or an association between SES and access to health care.”
Adds Howard: “Being poor isn’t bad for you per se.
It’s what you do that’s bad for you.”
A shortcoming of their study, the authors admit, was a lack of
data on those traditional risk factors. “Because of this absence,
the role of these factors [smoking, diabetes, hypertension, etc.]
in the
pathway between SES and stroke mortality could not be assessed,”
they write.
The authors say their observation of a higher stroke risk in
the three-state coastal plain shouldn’t diminish interest in
finding causes
of stroke in the entire belt but should focus on “a region meriting
truly
extreme concern.” They continue:
“The consistency and magnitude of the excess stroke mortality
in the stroke buckle region should draw the attention of
health-care providers
and public policy administrator and motivate an even greater effort
to
identify the underlying causes of the excess stroke mortality in
this region.”
Howard’s co-authors are Roger Anderson, Ph.D.; Gregory Russell,
M.S.; and Virginia J. Howard, M.S.P.H., all of Bowman Gray; and
Norman
J. Johnson, Ph.D., of the U.S. Census Bureau; and Paul Sorlie,
Ph.D., of
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Stroke is one of five journals published in Dallas by
the American Heart Association.
Related Folders: |
 |
|
|
|
|