Cote G, Alqaisi HA, Sridhar SS, et al.
Kidney and Cancer Outcomes with Standard vs. Kidney Protective
Chemotherapy Regimens for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic
Urothelial Carcinoma
ASN Annual Meeting 2020 -- Digital Meeting
J Am Soc Nephrol
(Oct) 31:10A 2020

BACKGROUND
Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy regimen is the
optimal initial treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but kidney
function eligibility and nephrotoxicity are treatment-limiting for many
patients. For patients unfit to receive cisplatin, other options include
alternative administration schedules (e.g. split dose cisplatin), carboplatin
-based regimens and non-platinum regimens. The aims of this study were to
compare cancer outcomes and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) during
treatment among 3 regimens of chemotherapy.
METHODS
We
conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients receiving first-
line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (2005-2019). We
compared standard gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem-cis) to: 1) gemcitabine-
cisplatin split dose regimen (split) with cisplatin divided over day 1 and 8;
and 2) combination of gemcitabine-carboplatin or single-agent gemcitabine
(gem/gem-carbo). We used Fine and Gray hazard models accounting for baseline
covariates and competing risk of death.
RESULTS
We identified
183 patients (98 gem-cis, 32 split and 53 gem/gem-carbo). Median age was 67
years-old (IQR: 61-73) and 76% were male. Median baseline eGFR was 78
mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR: 66-91) in gem-cis, 64 (48-77) in split,
and 45 (33-57) in gem/gem-carbo. Patients receiving split and gem/gem-carbo
were older, had worse performance status, and hypertension was more frequent.
Split and gem/gem-carbo regimens were associated with higher mortality and
progressive disease relative to gem-cis when adjusted for age, baseline eGFR,
ECOG, hypertension and diabetes with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.56 (95%CI: 1.04-
2.34; p=0.03) and 2.02 (95%CI: 1.36-3.01; p<0.01) respectively. Median
time to progressive disease was 242 (IQR: 137-444), 182 (122-279) and 131 (68
-257) days in gem-cis, split and gem/gem-carbo groups. There was no
significant association between regimen type and AKI with HR of 1.32 (95%CI:
0.62-2.81; p=0.47) and 0.98 (95%CI:0.46-2.09; p=0.96) for split and gem/gem-
carbo groups versus gem-cis.
CONCLUSION
Kidney protective
chemotherapy regimens were associated with increased disease progression and
mortality, without a significant difference in AKI. Alternative kidney
protective strategies are needed for patients with CKD and urothelial
cancer.

c Copyright 2020 -2021 American Society
of Nephrology. Reproduced with permission.
All ASN abstracts from the
2020 Annual Meeting are available at this
link and also are archived in .pdf form at ASN-Online.org
Disclaimer: Abstracts often have errors, both
typographical and otherwise. This posting is an electronic translation of
submitted abstracts which has not been verified against the original
submitted abstract nor with the authors for accuracy. As a result, there
may be errors, especially with regard to drug doses, but not limited to
these. Abstracts undergo only limited review, and data often are changed
as a result of the peer review process, so their reliability is less than
manuscripts published in peer-reviewed journals. In using these
summaries, you are agreeing that you are aware of these limitations.
The materials are provided on an as-is basis without any warranty of
any kind, either express or implied. In addition to errors, the
information presented may be incomplete or outdated.
The information contained is not intended nor recommended as a substitute
for professional medical advice. You are advised to check the appropriate
medical literature and the product information currently provided by the
manufacturer of each device to be used or drug to be administered to
verify the dosage, the method and duration of administration, or
contraindications. It is the responsibility of the treating physician or
other health care professional, relying on independent experience and
knowledge of the patient, to determine drug, disease, and the best
treatment for the patient.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, HDCN, ASN and their affiliates and
suppliers disclaim all
warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any
warranty of merchantability, non- infringement or fitness for a
particular purpose.
In no event shall HDCN, ASN, or their affiliates or suppliers be
liable for any damages whatsoever (including, but not limited to,
direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary
damages, or any damages for loss of profits, use, data, goodwill or
other intangibles) arising from or in any way relating to these terms,
the materials, or any information, goods or services obtained from or
referred to in the materials, whether based on warranty, contract, tort
(including, but not limited to, negligence), or any other legal theory,
and whether or not any or all of the limited entities is advised of the
possibility of such damages.
|