Yokoyama K, Tsakuda T, Saito H, Ubara Y, Katori H, et al
Is the polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene a predictor for progression of chronic renal diseases?
Am Soc Nephrol
J Am Soc Nephrol (abstract) (Sep) 7:1326 1996

The rate of progression of chronic renal disease varies widely among patients. While pharmacologic interventions have shown that ACE inhibitors slow the progression of chronic renal failure, the explanation for heterogenous rates of progression remain mysterious. One 'shotgun' approach to this problem is to identify several candidate genes that might contain subtle variations (allelic polymorphisms). DNA is isolated from many well-characterized patients, and examined for subtle DNA sequence variations. For progression of renal failure, one could envision subtle alterations in vasoconstrictors, vasodilators, ion channels, atherogenic factors, and growth factors and their associated receptors (just to name a few possibilities).

This paper looks at two candidate genes: the endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase, and angiotensin converting enzyme. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase, the enzyme that produces vasodilatory nitric oxide in blood vessels, is an attractive candidate gene since NO has anti-atherogenic actions that could alter the rate of progression. Recently, a polymorphism in the endothelial isoform of NO synthase (eNOS) was identified which is associated with coronary artery disease. ACE is an important candidate since ACE inhibition slows progression of chronic renal failure.

This abstract examined the incidence of polymorphisms for these genes in 58 non-diabetic patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis and 138 normal controls. They found that the HD patients had a higher prevalence of the new 'b' allele of eNOS (31% vs. 18% in controls), and the D allele of ACE (79% vs. 53% in controls). The authors claim that the endothelial NOS gene polymorphism is an important predictor for progression of non-diabetic chronic renal failure.

Comment: I suspect that we will see a great deal more of this type of study in the future. While the genetic analysis may be state of the art, the conclusions must still be based upon the groups of patients studied. Careful diagnosis and description of the patients are necessary. This abstract used the wrong comparison group. They should have measured the prevalence of the 'b' allele in patients who do not progress, or who progress slowly. (Robert A. Star, M.D., University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas)

To go back use the BACK button on your browser.
Otherwise click on the desired link to this article below:
Am Soc Nephrol
CRF by problem area : Progression
H: Pathophysiology : Endothelium, Nitric Oxide